June, 2009

...now browsing by month

 

Backgrounds in photographs

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009
Gold on a sea of Green - a picture from a walk I took with my daughter

Gold on a sea of Green - a picture from a walk I took with my daughter

A wise man once told me that the single best think you can do for your subjects is to control the background.  Ever since then, I’ve been working on controlling that background, to either offset or compliment the subject in a photo.

This is a complete lie.  The man who said that was Moose Petersen, and he was telling an entire class at last year’s photo safari at photoshop world.  And he said it approximately 15 minutes before I asked the question about snow that would haunt me for the next six months.  But I’ve already gone there.

No, he was saying that, from his perspective, the number one thing he did to improve his pictures was to make sure the background fit the image.  I’m barely understanding what he meant, but I’m starting to understand.

The photo to the right: there is a small bed of flowers up the road.  They’re fairly young right now, not fully opened.  Quite beautiful, but hard to photograph.  From above, you get flat light and not a terribly interesting image.  From the side, it’s a level sea of flowers.  From each angle, things kinda start looking… weird.

What you see here was a deliberate placement of the blurred background around the main (sharp) flower: each flower is separate, but only one stands out.  That one is taller than the rest.

A counter, example: the same flower, from a different angle:

Gold on Black, a different angle to the same flower

Gold on Black, a different angle to the same flower

The top flower is the exact same one as before, only from a different angle.  The background is in shadow, whereas the light is on the flowers.  This is technically a strobist technique, but by dropping exposure by 1-2 stops, I was able to get the greens in the background down to nearly black.  A slight tweak of curves in photoshop, and it’s almost flat black.

Again, it’s about controlling the background.

Share

California closing parks

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

It’s kinda too bad, but I’m not all that surprised: California is threatening to close the majority of its parks (via the always-excellent Jim Goldsteinfull list of parks here). I was going to be one of those visiting tourists this year.  So I’ll miss out on (maybe) an experience or two. On a larger scale, I think that this news will hurt tourism on the margin – if I didn’t have family there, then this news alone would make me cancel any travel plans.

But as I’ve already stated, I’m not too surprised.  That’s mostly because I see parks, campgrounds, etc. as a luxury, and California obviously has pretty big problems right now.  I figure they’ll recover about the time we’re tanking up here, but that’s a different story.

Now, I’m not a California resident, so I’m obviously a bit out of touch with the happenings there, but it strikes me by reading the comments both on Mr. Goldstein’s posting and a cross-linked posting on Ivan Makarov’s site that the responses aren’t too… well, constructive.

I dunno, maybe I’m just rambling here again, but I see folks with a bias essentially repeating the mistake that the Californian legislature has been making for years: yes, cut costs and services – but not the ones I care about, dammit!

This won’t fix the core problem: California has no money.  So yes, parks will get closed – and I kinda think that they should. So should many other things, as some folks have pointed out.  I guess the economics major in me sees it as a luxury that can’t be afforded right now.

But if they get closed, they still need to be protected. I can tell you first hand what happens to a campground that gets shut down – there’s one about 10 minutes from my house, by bike.  Let’s just say it’s a scary thing.  Don’t let your kids wander there alone.

Share

Photos replacing memories?

Monday, June 8th, 2009

My family is a funny group.  We’re all individuals (oh man, are we ever!), and we have our own personalities. I’m the one who’s always been a little off-kilter when it came to photographs.  At parties with friends & family, I’m the “ninja photographer” – the one who takes photos when you’re not expecting it.  I’ve been that way since I first had access to a camera.

Then there’s my brother, Jason.  A physicist by day, official press of the bay-area indy film circuit by night (seriously, he has press passes to some of the festivals).  When he’s not resolving the complexities of time & space, he’s doing what he does: watching movies (nice original title, bro).

I don’t want to say that he’s not big on photography.  His work in physics has involved gamma-ray cameras, but you’ll notice that he only uses a camera phone on his site.  He’s just not that big on most photos.  At one time he used to have a camera & took a lot of photos.  Then at one point he just decided that they were bad: people took pictures so they wouldn’t have to remember.  He wanted to remember, so he wouldn’t take any more pictures.

Well, that’s kind it.  And at the time, I thought “bullpucky.”  I mean, pictures help you to remember, right?

Wrong.

I’m not the first to suggest this, but it’s really hit home lately: pictures, the snapshot that we take at vacations & family gatherings – they tend to replace memories.  I look at my pictures of my daughter – she’s always happy, smiling, running.  Is that her? Partly, but not entirely.  She’s also strong-willed, insistent, fearless, and prone to sullen tantrums to get her ice cream now,dammit.  But even now, I look back to her old photos & only see her happy.

I suppose that’s a good memory, but it’s not the complete truth.

So consider that my rambling thought for today.

Share

Why JPG format for HDRs?

Sunday, June 7th, 2009

Someone asked me, after my JPG vs RAW  posts (1, 2, and 3), why I kicked my camera over to save images in JPG mode for doing the 9-shot bracketed HDR.  My thought process is like this: I usually shoot RAW because I like the flexability that it gives me to… well, save my photo.  I take a lot of pictures of a rapidly moving daughter, so I need that flexability.

For HDRs, though, I don’t really need the flexability.  Think of it like this: a normal RAW image gives you between one and two stops to either side of the center.  If you’ve mildly over- or under-exposed, then this will be easy to fix.  A 9-shot HDR gives you four stops to either side.  It’s already way ahead of the game.

If that were a 9-shot RAW pic?  That might push the overall range to 5 stops on either side.  We’re already wide enough in range at that point, that the extra stop doesn’t really mean much to me.

So I usually skip it.

Share

Learning to look for light

Saturday, June 6th, 2009
Backlit leaves with high-contrast clouds - an HDR

Backlit leaves with high-contrast clouds - an HDR

One of the things that is difficult when we’re just beginning is recognizing “good light.”  I suppose “good light” is a bit of a misnomer – it’s not so much that the light must be good, but you must know what to do with it.

Take the photo to the right, for example: I didn’t know what to look for at the time, but I was seeing these bright glowing leaves.  It just so happens that I’m reading Mountain Light, by Galen Rowell.  He comments on lighting over the course of the book: golden hour, dusk, off times, etc.  He also talks about the effects of angles of light on items, such as how to get greens to look their greenest, and why greens look brighter/more vivid in certain situations.

For the glow, he states that you look for angled sunlight, and have it backlight the target – be it leaves, grass, or what have you.  If you get it at the right time and right angle, you can expose for the surroundings and capture that glow tightly.

That’s what you see here. In hindsight, many of the shots I’ve been taking lately have been of this phenomenon.

Share

8 steps to taking an HDR photo

Friday, June 5th, 2009
A 9-frame HDR image of my neighborhood

A 9-frame HDR image of my neighborhood

The picture to the left I originally posted to Flickr on Sunday.  It’s had an interesting response: not overly popular, in fact.  The stretching of the angles (due to extreme wide angle) and the evening out of the extremes makes it almost look like a model instead of real life.

Well, this is most definately a photo of the neighborhood, but from an unusual angle: my roof.  And despite it not getting the love that other photos get (abstracts or B&W images seem more popular, unless the HDR has a ton of contrast), it has triggered more people to ask how I did it.

So here’s how to take the shot, from a technical point of view (I’ll gloss over the software details, but if you want a good example of that, then check out Trey’s Stuck In Customs tutorial). Steps:

  1. Frame the shot. Do this off the tripod, but at roughly the level that the tripod will be at.  You’ll fine-tune it later, so don’t mess with aperture, filters, etc.
  2. Fine-tune the frame. Which is to say, setup the tripod.  Get it in position.  Take your time setting it up so that it’ll be stable.  Get the camera on it & tweak the position until you have your composition set.
  3. Set the photograph settings. For a normal landscape, I might go into manual mode.  For this, though, it’s pretty unimportant.  I’m going to be bracketing, so no zone work here.  Set it to Aperture priority.   In this case, maximize aperture (f/25 on this lens).  This will give a slower shutter speed, though.
  4. Set bracketing. My DSLR has a setting.  For this wide of a range, I’m going to max out what the camera will do: 9 steps.  That means 9 photos, with EV calculated like this: 0,+1,+2,+3,+4,-1,-2,-3,-4.  So it’ll start normal, get faster for four shots, then slower for four shots.  For me, I also set the quality to large JPG.
  5. Attach remote cable. That is, assuming you haven’t already.  You’ll need it for the slower shots.
  6. Set focus. Do a half-press on the camera to acquire focus.  It’s not terribly important since the aperture is so tight, but it’s good to not have a blurry image after all this work. When set, turn focus mode to manual, so autofocus won’t accidentally mess you up between shots.
  7. Cover the eyehole. With the slower shots, there’s a chance of light leaking in to the frame, which could ruin the effect.  You can buy a little switch for it, or you could do what I do: imitate Tony Sweet (to phrase it better: I imitate what I saw him do in his Photography Workshop DVD).
  8. Start shooting. The trick here is to not just rip off a bunch of shots.  Each time the shutter clicks, you get a tiny bit of camera shake.  To minimize that, take slow, measured shots, especially on the slow side.  Count to nine & you’re done.

So that’s it as far as taking the photo.  There’s still some software work, but that will be saved for another day.

Share

Photographing snow

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

Alternate title: embarrassing myself in front of the pros.

I read an opinion online (probably on Fark) that Texans are a unique breed.  They’re overly proud of themselves – not for what they’ve done or what they can to, but because of where they live.  As if they have an overly-inflated sense of value ’cause their state is big.  And the only people worse than Texans, according to this opinion, are Alaskans: convinced that they’re something special because they can somehow survive in a giant, frozen state.

There’s some truth to this.  For the better part of the last two decades, I could easily leave state (well, to anywhere other than Hawaii) and say “I’m from Alaska.”  The response: instant fawning.  Usually you become the life of the party, making up crap about how hard the winters are (they’re not usually hard in Anchorage, just long – it’s usually far worse in the midwest).

Don’t do this with a well-travelled person.  Like I did, with Moose Petersen.  Yes, I made an ass of myself to the moose, but I learned something in the process.  Imagine this conversation:

Me: so, I’m from Alaska.
Moose: yeah, so?
Me: um, so we have a bunch of unique lighting up here and I was wondering…
Moose: No you don’t.
Me: Um, nevermind, I’ll go away now.
Moose: You had a question.  Ask it.
Me: um, I was wondering… how to properly shoot… snow?
Moose: who cares? Snow is snow, it’s white.  If you blow it out, who gives a rip?  Everyone knows what it is?
Me: I’m going to slink away now…

Well, that’s pretty much what happened.  Wording has been changed (feeble memory and all that), but there are some important lessons in there.  I walked away with these thoughts:

  • Seriously, who cares about properly exposing snow?  I mean, unless it’s the primary subject.  Even then, who cares? Duh.
  • Who cares that I’m from Alaska?  Moose doesn’t.  Shoot, his photographer base camp was in Anchorage last year and it easily looked like one of the tamer places he’s been.
  • Don’t try to out-cool Moose.  He camps with bears.  I avoid biking trails where bears occasionally wander.

Since this conversation, I’ve read at least two articles since our exchange where the mighty Moose has talked about properly exposing for snow.

Share

Another “about me” update

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

The “about” page has been updated again.  I suppose I wasn’t really happy with it, even after the second revision.  Just too… indirect, removed from the audience.  The current one is simpler, and more honest in a direct sort of way.

So again, for posterity, the about page used to be:

About

This site is an excercise in personal improvement. Or perhaps an experiment. When I originally started it, just a few short months before this writing, it was intended to be a repository of my learning. I used sentances like “one of the quickest ways to learn is to teach” and “you get to learn along with us.” Fancy words for saying “I need to write some of this stuff down before I forget it.” And that’s still true. There is an educational aim to the writing, but the topics are expanding past that. This is still primarily where I scribble down notes. The focus is still on small point-and-shoot cameras, like the sd500. But first and foremost, it is an excercise in self-discovery.

Licensing and Photo rights

Unless otherwise stated, all photographs on this site are the sole property of Me. No permission, implicit or otherwise, is given to anyone for any use whatsoever. If you wish to purchase pictures, either for personal, republishing, or commercial use, please contact me and we can talk about rates.

Share

Shooting in your own backyard

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009
Black and White treatment of a drain pipe

Black and White treatment of a drain pipe

I’m taking this as a literal statement, but it doesn’t have to be.  I mentioned in yesterday’s post that there’s a movement to take photos near your home, where you live.  While I stand by my statement that it’s better than nothing, I gotta say – it’s hard to be motivated.

And yet, a thought comes to me: while I’m not big on “projects” (as we see in photographer portfolios), I do like the concept of documenting what it’s like to live in my home.  Ignore the artistic side of the excercise, think more from a homeowner’s standpoint: if you’re going to sell a house, what if you had a photo book sitting on the counter, with a note inviting them to look through it?  It’s an opportunity to show them what it’s like to live in the house, as opposed to just the visual impact of looking at your staging.

There’s a dim chance that we may want to sell in a year, so as a project it’s a natural melding of interests and effort.  The photo above?  That’s one in the project, from Friday after the rains.  Black & White isn’t necessarily ideal for this, but I like the effect.

Hopefully by next January, I’ll have enough built up to get something published.  Who knows where – guess that’ll be a post for another time.

Share

Opportunities are where you find them

Monday, June 1st, 2009
View from our roof - doing repairs

View from our roof - doing repairs

Yesterday I posted about “frame within a frame” and metioned that it was a topic going around a while ago.  Well, it’s apparently back – I noticed in on Digital Photo School a post named “Crop and Chop.”  A slightly different point than I was trying to make yesterday, but the same concept.

Another meme going around these days is “shoot in your own backyard.”  As several pros have stated, there are thousands of photos of foreign places, sunsets, and exotic things.  Where are the common things?  Where is the spectacular in the ordinary?

I’m not so sure I’m all that big on shooting in my own back yard.  But it beats not shooting at all, and from the correct vantage point I can find fairly impressive views.

Take the shot to the right, for example.  I had some repairs I needed to do on the roof, so up I went.  Started looking around, and after a few days of rainy weather, noticed that the not only was it sunny, but it was a well saturated sunny!

So I did the logical thing: set my hammer & nails down, scrambled for my SLR (sorry, love that far more than my P&S – but the P&S is much, much more portable), and fired of a series of 9 photos.  Spent another 20 minutes shooting up there, so you’ll see a few more pics this week.

This shot: an HDR from 9 photos, all at maximum aperture (f/25).  Fired off on a tripod.  Much fun.

Share