October, 2009

...now browsing by month

 

A Self-Portrait

Saturday, October 31st, 2009
Self portrait

Self Portrait

  • Share/Bookmark

Karsh and Hepburn

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

I want to give an example of what I meant yesterday when I said that Yousef Karsh would catch the person in his portraits and amplify the person’s personality.  Witness (follow the link, I don’t own it) his portrait of Audrey Hepburn:

There are several things about this photo.  First, it is much, much better in print.  It’s larger, there are better details, and it’s much more impressive. I believe that this is true of all of Karsh’s work.  See it in print, or you lose much of the intent.

Now, the subject is Audrey Hepburn.  Ms Hepburn is, of course, one of the most beautiful creatures to have lived on this planet.  But she was much more than that, even in 1956.  Go ahead, read the Wikipedia article on her.  It’s worth it.  When Karsh was doing her portrait, he captured a great deal of the suffering and sadness that went with her.  He also captured her elegance and her subtle strength.

This image is on the back cover of Regarding Heroes.  Again, highly recommended.

  • Share/Bookmark

About Yousef Karsh: Regarding Heroes

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

I recently ordered and received a book on the classic photography of Yousuf Karsh:  Regarding Heroes.  Now, I had heard of him and even recognize some work – Mr. Karsh is one of those people whose work reverberates throughout the world.  I was completely unprepared for the beauty in this book.

If I can get my act together, I’ll go over a few of the photos over the next few days.  Suffice it to say, it contains photos of past greats.  This is a book on portraiture.  But oh, what portraiture!  I have seen many great portraits, and have heard many people talk about how the point is to make a human connection.  Never have I really seen that in action.  The photos I see in this book don’t reflect the person and his/her personality, it amplifies it.

Just a gorgeous book.  Grab it if you can find it!

  • Share/Bookmark

Second Reaction to the Series of Comments, pt 2

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

Continuing on from yesterday’s post

the second photo (http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/faces4.html) was described as a failure.  Now, I would like to start off by saying that this photo in no way represents my taste.  I might make it if paid, but it wouldn’t be in my portfolio.  Well, maybe one that I keep in the office to show certain people, but certainly nothing this public.

Here’s the deal: it’s a non-stop cliche. Things that jump out at me:

  • Sepia-toned;
  • “Hip” angle;
  • Couple kissing;
  • Drinks in hands;
  • Young couple;

Furthermore, I personally believe that they’re all done poorly: the kiss is two faces, awkwardly smooshed up against each other.  The drinks are tacky, plastic 40-oz bottles of brand-name low-flavor beer (disclaimer: I’m a beer snob and have been known to brew my own).  The angle denotes nothing to me – normally it’s good for showing action.  In this case, it seems to show the overly aggressive desires of a young man (like I’d be any different).  The couple: they’re young, but not the “pretty” type of young.  Not the type of young adults that other adults want to look like (not rail-thin, not supermodel-hot).  That’s a good picture for them, not for a portfolio.

Sepia tones, of course, are overplayed.  They work for some situations, often for showing memory.  Again, the people buying the pics may like it, but it’s not portfolio territory.

OK, so I’ve thoroughly trashed this photo.  Is it the “failure” that it was described to be?

No, I don’t think so.

It still has a visual appeal to some people, and anyone who’s had excess fun on Spring Break will have a different perspective.  By all appearances it fits the couple and tells us something about them.

That’s not failure.  But I still say it’s not a good choice for a portfolio.

  • Share/Bookmark

Second Reaction to the Series of Comments

Monday, October 19th, 2009

So after my initial reaction (see  yesterday’s post), I started to think: what was it that made these photos so horrible?  Since I don’t want to violate copyright, I will post links, their description from the “John” guy, and a description of each photo.

Today’s link: http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/faces14.html
Description: An older lady in a loose, pleated (almost wrinkled) light-yellow dress.  She sits on a chair, her arms resting on the arms of the chair, straight at us with her hands hanging down.  She is square to the viewer and facing us in the frame.  The background is a reddish-orange, and the light from the background is reflecting throughout, giving a slight orange tint to her face and dress.  Her lips are a fairly bright red, and she is wearing sunglasses.

Overall, it’s a warm image of a happy person.  At least, that’s the impression that it makes on me.  I suppose if I were Jörg Colberg, I might trash the work and agree with the others.  Of course, if I were Mr. Colberg, I’d cite good reasons to support my position (if I were really him, I doubt I’d waste my time with this).

So, my first glance impression: a little too warm for my tastes, but not too bad.  It has a couple of important elements: the person is relaxed, happy (seemingly genuinely so), and seems to be full of confidence.

Further review gives me the following pros and cons:

Pros:

It’s a warm photo, and endearing.  If this was taken for me (as the purchaser), I’d doubtlessly have a strong emotional attachment to it.  There are good colors and textures going on – too many for some, but I think they help draw the eye to the least textured part – the lady’s face and her smile.

Cons:

There is a lot of color bleed going on here.  The oranges are overpowering, especially as they get reflected into the frame.  The sunglasses – perhaps appropriate for this client, but in a portfolio?  The general rule of thumb is to show a person’s eyes.  You connect to the person through the eyes, and the shades spoil that.  Hand position: hardly flattering, and considered a huge negative – this shows the wrinkles, which in turn show her age (not that there’s anything wrong with that, exactly).  By leaning her back, you lose her figure in the dress, which in turn creates a less-than-optimal pose for showing her face and neck.  Her neck, as a result, has more wrinkles and shadows than might otherwise be.  The dress: by hiding form, she is turned into a blob.  And the yellow of her dress is too dull for such a vivid background.

Boy, that sounds like a lot, no?  Well, no – I’m being extra-critical here.  I’m trying to figure out what makes this a disaster.

Summary:

So is this the “disaster” that it was described as being?  I don’t think so.  Not my taste, for sure. But that horrible?  Again, I don’t think so.  At best, it’s exactly what the client wanted.  At worse, it’s merely tough to look at and overly bright in a way that I find grating (to the eyes)

I wonder what Jay Maisel would say.

  • Share/Bookmark

First Reaction to that Series of Comments

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

Read yesterday’s post to see what I’m talking about.

OK, so my first reaction was “geez, what’s wrong with that John Thomas guy?”  His comment:

John Thomas Reply:
October 14th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
@Nicole Morgenthau, who did he send in to re-shoot this disaster?
http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/faces14.html
or this failure?
http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/faces4.html
or this horrid frame?
http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/lifestyle5.html

I mean, really – was that called for?  I mean, descriptions like “failure,” “horrid”, “disaster”: tastes in pictures are subjective, and I could easily call all three photos “fantastic” from a certain perspective.  Perhaps that was his point?  Nicole’s husband accusing others of outputting crap is his subjective call over their work, and it’s no more valid than John’s (maybe) tongue-in-cheek criticism of Nicole’s work.

But here’s the deal: two other photographers immediately agreed with him that Nicole’s work was crap.  Again, they may have meant “fine, it’s crap – prove to us that you have the skills and taste to give it such a name.

  • Share/Bookmark

Series of Comments on Photo Editor

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

Specific to this post: http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/10/14/every-dumbass-with-a-camera/

I love reading these posts, especially the comments.  This one had an interesting thread, though: starting with (at the time of this writing) comment #11.  The text is roughly like this:

Nicole Morgenthau wrote:
My photographer husband wants his business slogan to be, “You can hire some jack ass to fuck it up, or hire me if you want the job done right.”
This is of course directed to the cheap skates, that come back to you to reshoot a disaster.

John Thomas Reply:
October 14th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
@Nicole Morgenthau, who did he send in to re-shoot this disaster?
http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/faces14.html
or this failure?
http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/faces4.html
or this horrid frame?
http://www.nicolemorgenthau.com/lifestyle5.html

Nicole Morgenthau Reply:
October 14th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
@John Thomas,
Wow- you’re so kind. Thanks for your support.

Dean Reply:
October 14th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
@John Thomas, Good eye John. Now let’s see yours!

Michael Schulz Reply:
October 14th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
@John Thomas, I agree with Dean. Nicole didn’t bother to put her URL in her comment. Looked through her work. She’s got a client list and is a working pro. Now let’s see what you have to offer and what your foundation is.
Mike

Digest that for a day or two.  I have been.  Then come back and think about your reactions.

  • Share/Bookmark

Last Sunday

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Was spent mostly looking at this:

Beer?

Spaten pilsner

  • Share/Bookmark

An image from Humpy’s Oktoberfest

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Just to share what Humpy’s looks like when the beer is flowing:

The Crowd at Humpy's

The Crowd at Humpy's

  • Share/Bookmark

Oktober

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

My favorite holiday of the year is Oktoberfest.  Mostly because I can eat & drink for nearly a month and I won’t be accused of being a pig.  This is legitimate reason enough, I feel.

However, I only really do one event: Oktoberfest at Humpy’s.  For two Sundays, the Alaska Blaskapelles toot their horns while you wend your way through a 5-course meal. With each course paired with a beer, and interspersed with hollering, hooting, and a symphony of other loud revelry.

This year’s event marks our 5th in a row, I believe. Click to continue »

  • Share/Bookmark