Flower pics. Looking at ‘em close. Sure is purty! But heck yeah, quite the cliche.
So, what would you do with this? It’s just not working for me…
Check out these three items:
Note that the total price is just over $600, and remember that I said “cheap-ish“. You’ll see a few more posts about this setup over the next few days – this is the setup I took with me to Hawaii for my latest dive trip. Click to continue »
Following up on the thoughts on this post, witness the image to right. Now, I’m not claiming it’s the best image, nor am I trying to even state that I’m done with post-processing. I am, but only because I’ve decided I’m not happy with the composition.
But I am happy with the results of my tests. In this case, I now know: when doing handheld bracketed shots, Photoshop CS5′s “Merge to HDR Pro” function is incredibly more useful than Photomatix 3.2. It’s not just the ghosting, although that sure cleaned up a lot.
No, it’s how easily CS5 finds like components and merges them together. Seriously, it’s just incredible: this is a three-frame HDR, in JPG. Compare the sharpness (not the contrast) and the merging to this: Click to continue »
Just a test shot that I thought I’d post. I may be putting up a couple more over this evening. Testing CS5′s “Merge to HDR Pro” function, comparing it to Photomatix Pro. This one is an excercise in rescuing a screwed up frame: I had the color balance set to tungsten when I took this, so everything was hyper-blue. Arguably still is, but that’s the HDR saturation effect. Click to continue »
Regarding yesterday’s post, a disclaimer: I’m a NAPP member, and I’m happy to take donations from anyone else who wants to join. By donations, I mean “click the image to the right” if you want to sign up – get referral points for anyone who does sign up by clicking through the links.
Don’t like clicking on an image? Click here to sign up!
However, I must add: don’t sign up because I posted the link. In fact, don’t sign up if you don’t want to. Seriously, if you’re not that interested, it’s a waste of money.
However, I’ll tell you why I joined (and pay each year): first of all, the cost isn’t that much. Sure, it could go for more fun things (like a few more SCUBA charters), but it’s small over the course of a couple of years. And the cost? Since I keep up-to-date with Photoshop, it effectively pays for itself – they offer a 15% discount on all Adobe products.
Do the math: 15% of $699 is $105, roughly. A one year membership is $99. They’re paying you to join!
Mind you, I actually have a more expensive suite from Adobe, so my discount effectively covers a two-year membership.
Add on to that the Photoshop User mag, and you’re getting quite a deal. Plus there are video tutorials, some semi-active forums (pretty good, for being closed off from the world), a Photoshop Help center (for newbs mostly, but they won’t trash you if you’re not), and a variety of other discounts, perks, and benefits.
Like conferences? You’ll also get $100 bucks off of Photoshop World (if you’re not a member, you’ll pay $100 more, but get a 1-year membership to NAPP). I have been to these (two years ago), and they’re great for photographers – heavy info on lighting, lots of good gear at discount (the expo at the time was fantastic!), lots of famous people to mingle with. Plus you get to party in Vegas!
Seriously, even if you’re not going to upgrade Photoshop, it’s worth it just for the discounts at Apple, B&H, Adorama, etc. Sign up here, or (if you have any doubt) go to their main page & request a free issue of the mag.
…So that they don’t come out like this:
The best part of this? It’s an add from NAPP, inviting me to sign up for their mobile alerts. Kinda fun, seeing an ad targeting mobile devices getting it so wrong…