September, 2011

...now browsing by month

 

Flickr is falling by the wayside

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

The more I’ve used G+, the less I’ve been interested in Flickr. Some of it is the interaction – it’s so much smoother in G+, it’s almost painful to use Flickr. A lot of it is just their lack of attention to detail.

Interaction is probably the largest bit. It’s easy to follow other photo producers. But leave a comment, and it’s nearly impossible to track replies to your comments. It’s fine for building a following, or a list of followers. It’s a failure for building interpersonal ties. That’s unforgiveable in the age of social media, I think.

But it’s solveable. I suppose there are third-party apps that could help, or other workarounds. Flickr could (god forbid) do some actual development of their own site. Shoot, even Facebook rolled out a bunch of features recently. If they could shift quickly, surely Flickr could?

But if Flickr were to try to adapt, I fear their lack of attention to detail would kill them. It’s a hard thing to define – why are Google’s, 500px, and others’ sites so much easier to use? Why do bugs still exist in Flickr’s interface?

The experience on other sites isn’t perfect. But Flickr – shoot, I can’t click on images in the web app. My Android phone won’t position the lightbox-enabled photo properly. That’s a pretty important piece, don’t you think?

Share

Thoughts On Shooting (photos) in the Streets

Sunday, September 18th, 2011

Trond Lindhom (profile) posted a question on G+ the other day: “what do other street shooter out there … use when shooting on the streets?” Plenty of responses, but not a lot that were all that useful.

My own comment, citing 35mm was just an off-the-cuff response. Thinking about it now, I realize I’m wrong. You know what I use when I’m doing “street” photography?

Whatever I have in my hands.

Really, that’s it. If I have my G11, then I shoot with that – and make medium-wide to medium telephoto shots. If it’s my LX3, then I know I’m doing wide (20mm) to standard (50mm) shots. My cellphone: wide, and probably through a filter of some sort. The SLR? Whichever lens is attached (usually the 18-200).

There are no rules, just limitations based on the gear.

However, my own initial response interests me a little bit. I was really thinking about the simplicity and ease-of-use that comes with using a rangefinder.  In the old days, street photogs would set their f/stop to where they needed it, find an appropriate shutter speed, and pre-focus for optimal resolution – essentially anything that would get their hyperfocal distance set & give optimal sharpness.

When I’m going out deliberately to shoot on the streets, this is my favorite technique.  Not the most optimal, not the one with the best results or best creativity.  It’s just the most fun. Shoot, I still do it with film on fully-manual cameras! In fact, I’m still using the Graflex 35 and the Nikonos 2 – how’s that for old school?

So as a slightly different twist on Trond’s question: what is your favorite approach, or perhaps technique in the sense written here?

City Hall

City Hall

Share

Lady Liberty

Saturday, September 10th, 2011

The first time I saw the lady liberty, it struck me how small she is. It sort of amazes me, in a way: at one time, this was an awe-inspiring, huge structure that stood out from everything around it. Now, it’s just a dot in the water, obscured by buildings and construction. Even in the aftermath of 9/11 and the gaping hole in Manhattan, it’s size is diminished by the huge everything in NYC.

Lady Liberty

Lady Liberty

Pardon the poor quality.  It’s a snapshot from a cruise ship that was in motion.  This just seemed somewhat fitting for the 10th anniversary weekend of the disaster in NYC.

Share

Series of Images

Sunday, September 4th, 2011

Remember that link to the side, to the Downhill Stream of Consciousness? If you like underwater pics or general snapshots (not edited, not processed, just left as-is), take a gander there.

In fact, start here, then click through the “next day” links. Might be worth it, if you’re into that kind of stuff. An example:

Tree at Night, handheld

Tree at night, handheld

Share

Google+ limits

Sunday, September 4th, 2011

I just read last week (sorry, lost the post) that there is a maximum of 250 remember posts on G+. Rather, there are 250 maximum browseable posts. You can search all you want.

I’m not sure what to make of this. It certainly changes much of the perception of its value, at least to me. From what I understand, direct links work . But if you try to browse through someone’s posts, it stops after 23 pages or so.

This is rational to me from a programming standpoint. But from a user standpoint, this is pretty bad. Not a deal-breaker, but certainly means that I can’t give up on the blog just yet…

Share