Observations

...now browsing by category

 

A Spiderweb, some bokeh, and a point of view

Monday, August 9th, 2010
Spiderweb in the Golden Hour

Spiderweb in the Golden Hour

Yesterday I posted the spiderweb in the image to the right to Flickr. This particular photo is, perhaps, my favorite (self-made) spiderweb shot to date. I said that at the time, now I’ll give a bit of an explanation.

Typically I tend to *not* like spiderweb photos: they’re all the same.  Particularly the ones that I take – I see something & try to bring out that detail.  But I never quite… catch the beauty of what I see.

A week or so before going on this vacation, however, I re-read the first couple of chapters from Photography and the Art of Seeing. The author (Freeman Patterson) devotes one of the first chapters to “thinking sideways,” and specifically uses the example of a spiderweb:

Webs are so beautiful in their own right that they had kept me from examining them carefully, and especially from photographing them in a personal way…

…When you think sideways you will find new ways to see your subject matter, and you will stumble upon discoveries and happy accidents.  Abandon your normal premises , and go on a search for new ones.

This was in my mind when I first saw the spiderweb. But it was just a web at mid-day.  Nothing special, kinda dingy.  Later that afternoon, the light began to yellow, and the dinginess turned golden.  At this point I noticed it again, pulled out my camera, and started to circle the web. Looking up, down, climbing on a chair, squatting under it.  On a monopod, off the monopod, against the light, with the light…

… at some point, I found that there was an entire side that brought out the gold in the light.  It wasn’t the typical angle I’d normally look for, but I found the view more pleasing.  I kept working up & down, within the same basic area of light (and quickly, the light fades fast), playing with different depths of field.  I was finding the background to be better than the web.

The end result is what you see; the focus on this one wasn’t the spiderweb itself.  Rather, it was creating an abstract in the background, and then using the spiderweb to break up that pattern.

  • Share/Bookmark

“Once you figure out a work of art…”

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010
Go ahead, figure this out

Go ahead, figure this out

“… it ceases to have any interest.”  I’m paraphrasing a quote that I read today, mostly because it touched a nerve.  For me, this is somewhat true.

I think it’s an issue of mental stimulation.  If you’re stimulated enough by a work to be fascinated, you relish in the various tales that it tells. I’m noticing that I tend to follow artists who aren’t easy to decipher as a result.

For example, David Epstein (NSFW), who I’ve followed for quite a while now.  Sometimes it’s quirky humor, sometimes his work has surprising depth. Unless you’re looking at his candid street shots, there’s almost always something hidden for fun.

Sorry, you won’t see the best of his work unless you’re on Flickr and labeled as a “Friend.”  But it’s great, trust me.

  • Share/Bookmark

Opportunities in the Dark

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

A pic posted to Flickr this morning:

God Rays in the Morning

God Rays in the Morning

This summer has officially become a repeat of the summer of ’08. For those of us up here, it was “the summer that was not.” Rain, clouds, fairly cold… Technically a bit warmer than it was in 2008, but none of our typical summer beauty.

Nonetheless, beauty is to be found. This, in the dark spaces: a morning image, from on the way to work…

  • Share/Bookmark

Portfolio Probs

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010
Flickr Favebrowser, screenshot

How do you display images?

Take some time to check out the Epic Edits blog.  Specifically the post on “10 Online Photography Portfolio No-No’s.”  The subject is of interest to me for a couple of reasons: primarily, I’m (among other things) a wearer of many hats.  One of those hats is Web Developer (a programmer, actually – but that spills into the realm of development and design), and just about everything on that list is something that I have done.

Deliberately?  Willingly?  No, not by a long shot – but that’s what the client wants, and that’s what the person writing the check gets.

Three of the items did make me think a bit, and I thought I’d expand on them here: Click to continue »

  • Share/Bookmark

Thoughts on Kelby Training

Monday, July 5th, 2010

I mentioned recently that I watch videos on Kelby Training. The question then came up from a friend: “is it worth the money?”

I’m not sure, is the answer.  A few cons, followed by pros.

Cons:

  • It’s expensive. Not saying it isn’t worth it, but for that cash, the private/amateur has to think about it (for business?  That’s cheap – write it off!).
  • It uses a flash player. I know they have to worry about theft, but I’d really like to take the lessons with me on a laptop.  It would be great to watch on airlines, in meetings, in transit… But no, not yours: must use streaming flash video.
  • Lessons are often of dubious value. There is a lot of old stuff on there.  Useful to some, but not to me.  An added annoyance: there are a lot of “get up to speed quick” lessons each time Adobe releases something new (like all the CS5 stuff now).
  • Length of lessons.  Hard to criticize this, but I will.  When I’m watching on a computer (an *interactive* tool), I get fidgety.  10 minutes?  Fine.  20?  I barely hold on.  An hour or more?  To Hell with that.  This ain’t TV, it’s the internet.
  • Video quality can suffer. Which isn’t much of a complaint: “it’s not as smooth as a multi-million-dollar movie.”  Get over it.  But it does feel cheap, at times.

Pros:

  • The information is pretty good, even if you need to wade through an hour & a half of info to get it.
  • While not as good as personal tutoring, it’s about as close as you can get.
  • For the money, it’s hard to get as many knowledge experts in any one place.
  • Taken in small bites, the learning can be quite effective.

Overall:

It’s kind of hard to say if it’s worth it.  I’ve renewed for two years in a row & I expect to renew at least one more time.  After three years, I may have learned enough so that the benefit just isn’t there.  On the other hand, I thought that would be the case after one year, and I’m aiming at three now.

I do find that I tend to watch in spurts, or when I really need it (really, when I needed it two weeks prior, it seems).  Three months no watchie, followed by a weekend glut of four lessons. And it’s always there when I need it.

Yeah, probably worth it. To me.

  • Share/Bookmark

A new Perspective

Sunday, July 4th, 2010

I was watching a class on Kelby Training yesterday that featured Jay Maisel. Now, I’ve seen Jay before, and I’m familiar with many of his more common comments.  There are a few things he has said that has resonated deeply with me.  The one that is sticking with me today (paraphrased):

When I get ready to take a picture, and it’s something I’ve seen before, why bother? I’m interested in something new.

Mind you, he’s not dismissing photographs for observation or study purposes. Nor for practicing technical details of photography.  He’s only speaking to his own tastes. Click to continue »

  • Share/Bookmark

Selective Color is so Cliche.

Saturday, July 3rd, 2010

Yet, sometimes it is appropriate.  The example commonly used  is to draw attention to something, such as a rose in a bride’s hand.  This has been done so many times, it has become cliche – almost everyone has one.  As a result, I tend to avoid this technique like the plague.

However, it is occasionally appropriate for a given photo.  For example, a photo that is already essentially a monochrome, despite being in color. Click to continue »

  • Share/Bookmark

Apologies to B&H, et al.

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

I tried, guys – I really did.  I wanted to buy from you.  I always want to buy from you, or someone – anyone – who specializes in photography.

Don’t get me wrong: I love the convenience of Amazon, but when it comes to quality listings and specialized knowledge I like to stick with the specialists. Like you.

Unfortunately, you don’t like me.  I live in another country, as far as you’re concerned.  Like our brothers & sisters in Puerto Rico or Hawaii, you add the “not us” tax.  Contiguous 48 states?  Free shipping!  Alaska?  Twenty bucks minimum, give or take. It’s probably worse in Hawaii.

I just wanted a monopod – figured I’d grab one & reward The Online Photographer at the same time.  Add on a head & a tabletop tripod and you’ve got my order.  And your prices: on par with everything Amazon offered, even a tad cheaper.

But with shipping?  12% more expensive.

And that’s why I order from Amazon every other month, but from you guys only once every other year.  It adds up, guys.

It adds up.

  • Share/Bookmark

Not sure ’bout this Flickr update

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Flickr is getting ready to roll out a new design and interface. I’m not sure I really like it, though – seems to run a little slow, kinda hard to find things.

Some things are better, though – adding your photo to groups is much more efficient (once you figure out how to do it).

Guess we’ll see what comes of it…

  • Share/Bookmark

Mixed feelings on the CS5 vs Photomatix Debate

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

I noted a short while ago that I was pretty enamored with Photoshop’s new “Merge to HDR Pro” feature in CS5. I need to reiterate: when it comes to merging the images, there’s just no comparison: CS5 merges far better.

However, after a few days of heavy use I’m really noticing that it’s rendering is… well, passable. But Photomatix kicks CS5′s but all over town.

So the bottom line: for HDR shots that don’t align too well, CS5 is probably better. But your tone mapping will be the poorer for it, unless you can get it into Photomatix.

I’ve wasted far too much time trying to get the images to move over with quality between the two; for now, I post this. In a day or two, maybe more.

  • Share/Bookmark