camera

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Thoughts On Shooting (photos) in the Streets

Sunday, September 18th, 2011

Trond Lindhom (profile) posted a question on G+ the other day: “what do other street shooter out there … use when shooting on the streets?” Plenty of responses, but not a lot that were all that useful.

My own comment, citing 35mm was just an off-the-cuff response. Thinking about it now, I realize I’m wrong. You know what I use when I’m doing “street” photography?

Whatever I have in my hands.

Really, that’s it. If I have my G11, then I shoot with that – and make medium-wide to medium telephoto shots. If it’s my LX3, then I know I’m doing wide (20mm) to standard (50mm) shots. My cellphone: wide, and probably through a filter of some sort. The SLR? Whichever lens is attached (usually the 18-200).

There are no rules, just limitations based on the gear.

However, my own initial response interests me a little bit. I was really thinking about the simplicity and ease-of-use that comes with using a rangefinder.  In the old days, street photogs would set their f/stop to where they needed it, find an appropriate shutter speed, and pre-focus for optimal resolution – essentially anything that would get their hyperfocal distance set & give optimal sharpness.

When I’m going out deliberately to shoot on the streets, this is my favorite technique.  Not the most optimal, not the one with the best results or best creativity.  It’s just the most fun. Shoot, I still do it with film on fully-manual cameras! In fact, I’m still using the Graflex 35 and the Nikonos 2 – how’s that for old school?

So as a slightly different twist on Trond’s question: what is your favorite approach, or perhaps technique in the sense written here?

City Hall

City Hall

Share

Cool New Camera – um, sorta

Monday, April 11th, 2011

Thanks to TOP, I notices this tempting little toy. A pinhole camera from a human skull.

Creepy.

Cool.

I think I want…

Share

G11 under water

Monday, May 24th, 2010

It’s a bit early fir a full diagnosis, but so far I’m tempted to give th’ G11 a thumb’s up for it’s underwater performance. Some sample pics to come later, though – for now, I have more tests to run.

Just suffice it to say, the slowness hasn’t Newman issue in my dirst two days of testing.

Share

Urban disguise, a second impression

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

After a short couple of weeks, I can say that I’m starting to like what the urban disguise offers.  Give me a month though, and you’ll get a better overview.  I have some events coming up that’ll really put it through the paces.

This short in, I just want to say: it does very well at storing everything you need, like a “go bag.”  Right now, I can grab it & go, assured that I have the minimum of what I need to get things done.

Share

Opportunities are where you find them

Monday, June 1st, 2009
View from our roof - doing repairs

View from our roof - doing repairs

Yesterday I posted about “frame within a frame” and metioned that it was a topic going around a while ago.  Well, it’s apparently back – I noticed in on Digital Photo School a post named “Crop and Chop.”  A slightly different point than I was trying to make yesterday, but the same concept.

Another meme going around these days is “shoot in your own backyard.”  As several pros have stated, there are thousands of photos of foreign places, sunsets, and exotic things.  Where are the common things?  Where is the spectacular in the ordinary?

I’m not so sure I’m all that big on shooting in my own back yard.  But it beats not shooting at all, and from the correct vantage point I can find fairly impressive views.

Take the shot to the right, for example.  I had some repairs I needed to do on the roof, so up I went.  Started looking around, and after a few days of rainy weather, noticed that the not only was it sunny, but it was a well saturated sunny!

So I did the logical thing: set my hammer & nails down, scrambled for my SLR (sorry, love that far more than my P&S – but the P&S is much, much more portable), and fired of a series of 9 photos.  Spent another 20 minutes shooting up there, so you’ll see a few more pics this week.

This shot: an HDR from 9 photos, all at maximum aperture (f/25).  Fired off on a tripod.  Much fun.

Share

Custom White Balance

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

I don’t actually use this much these days, but it’s a handy option to have, especially in difficult to gauge situations.  Setting white balance is easy; it’s as easy as taking a snapshot.  Using it appropriately is tougher.

the custom options for white balance

the custom options for white balance

Setting white balance: go into the menu, like we did yesterday.  This time, go to the far-right option (looks like a couple of triangles and a dot).  Immediately, you’ll start seeing funny things going on, like in the pic to the right.  That’s the custom white balance screen evaluating the balance based on… a black piece of paper. To set this as the white balance point, do what it says: press the MENU button.

So yeah, it’s easy to set white balance.  but what should you use?  Well, something white.  Or non-tinted, at least – grey technically works pretty well, so long as it’s a dead gray.  Snow works, so long as it isn’t yellow (and for us in Anchorage, so long as it isn’t break-up).  Walls sometimes work – I’ve found decent results using grey construction blocks and the interior walls of my house (we painted it an almost flat white).  Shoot, after a long winter in Alaska, I’m so pasty I can even use the back of my hand and get decent results.

These are all techniques that work in a pinch, but it’s better to use a real white balance card or something similar to get it right.  When travelling, I usually carry a card with me.  Running around town? Not at all.  That’s why I rely on presets with the sd500.
What about my SLR?  I usually use kelvin. That’s not an option on the sd500.

Share

Last words on the equipment

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

OK, this is the last thing I’ll say about the equipment, I promise!  Just a point about how easy it has been to pack around and use. Outside of being an important tool for documenting my child as she grows (and that is the main reason for having it), it has also served me well in a variety of places:

  • Scuba diving in Hawaii;
  • Hiking/mountain climbing (sorta) in Alaska;
  • Cruising the Carribean on the east, Mexico on the west;
  • Bermuda, both in the ocean and around the islands;
  • The Cascades in Washington;
  • SoCal;
  • The beaches of Maui, Oahu, and Hawaii (big island – and it went through the sulfur springs of the volcano);
  • Blizzard ski trips in Anchorage;
  • Pouring thunderstorms in Florida (technically, the outer edges of hurricane Katrina, before it headed towards NO);

I do have an SLR, and I definitely prefer its quality.  But this is the camera that I usually have with me when I’m not planning on taking pics.

Share

Pros and Cons to the pocket camera

Monday, April 6th, 2009
Quick morning snapshot - one of the reasons I love the small camera

Quick morning snapshot - one of the reasons I love the small camera

After three years of using a small, compact camera and trying to squeeze out the last bit of quality, I’ve picked up some plusses and minuses.

Plusses

The camera is small. It takes less space than my wallet. It’s always there.

Quality is decent. Enough pixels to barely pull off an 11×14 image, and pretty sharp at 8×10.

Images are pretty sharp, and you have some room for cropping.

It’s durable. I’ve dropped it on concrete, fallen on it while skiing and mountain biking, banged it against the side of a boat (and sent it flying against SCUBA tanks), and generally abused the crap out of it. Damage? When cleaning with solution, water might get into the lens. Some scratches. One broken piece of plastic (part of the batter retainer, and not necessary).

Cons

Don’t even think about 16×20 pics or larger.

Detail does suffer. It just doesn’t have the glass, light, or sensor to pick up the fine details – not when compared to an SLR, at least.

Really, that’s it. Pretty damn good!

Share

Why this setup?

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

First of all, this isn’t my only camera.  It’s my go-to camera, though.  Why did I buy the sd500 and waterproof case?  Well, the case really followed the camera.  The camera?  I liked the sd400 (at the time, it was one of the best compacts out there), and this was the newer one.  And it was on sale – the sd550 had just come out.

And addition reason: I was motivated.  A burglary had relieved us of all cameras (along with the video of my daughter’s 1st birthday – I still wish eternal suffering to those bastards), and with a year-old daughter, I needed something.  The case followed that summer.

Share

Extra equipment for the Canon sd500

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009
The waterproof case for the sd500 (click for larger view)

The waterproof case for the sd500 (click image for larger view)

About two months after I bought the sd500, I picked up the WP-DC70.  That’s the camera’s waterproof case (and well worn, as you can see).  I personally grabbed it for snorkeling on the rare vacations, but quickly found it indispensable for the beach, pool, and most anywhere with dust or other contaminants.

You do have to be careful about the glass in front of the lens.  Many of my beach shots have a bit of a soft-focus touch to them, or blurry spots.  This is either water droplets that haven’t come off  or my 4-year-old’s fingerprints.

The main thing, for me, is that it’s good to 120 ft (30 meters, really).  See, just in case I ever go SCUBA diving, I want it with me.  Proof of concept: in late February/early March I did exactly that, going down to 70 meters at the deepest.  The  two-year-old poorly maintained case still held up spectacularly.

Share