Observations

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Thoughts On Shooting (photos) in the Streets

Sunday, September 18th, 2011

Trond Lindhom (profile) posted a question on G+ the other day: “what do other street shooter out there … use when shooting on the streets?” Plenty of responses, but not a lot that were all that useful.

My own comment, citing 35mm was just an off-the-cuff response. Thinking about it now, I realize I’m wrong. You know what I use when I’m doing “street” photography?

Whatever I have in my hands.

Really, that’s it. If I have my G11, then I shoot with that – and make medium-wide to medium telephoto shots. If it’s my LX3, then I know I’m doing wide (20mm) to standard (50mm) shots. My cellphone: wide, and probably through a filter of some sort. The SLR? Whichever lens is attached (usually the 18-200).

There are no rules, just limitations based on the gear.

However, my own initial response interests me a little bit. I was really thinking about the simplicity and ease-of-use that comes with using a rangefinder.  In the old days, street photogs would set their f/stop to where they needed it, find an appropriate shutter speed, and pre-focus for optimal resolution – essentially anything that would get their hyperfocal distance set & give optimal sharpness.

When I’m going out deliberately to shoot on the streets, this is my favorite technique.  Not the most optimal, not the one with the best results or best creativity.  It’s just the most fun. Shoot, I still do it with film on fully-manual cameras! In fact, I’m still using the Graflex 35 and the Nikonos 2 – how’s that for old school?

So as a slightly different twist on Trond’s question: what is your favorite approach, or perhaps technique in the sense written here?

City Hall

City Hall

Share

Google+ limits

Sunday, September 4th, 2011

I just read last week (sorry, lost the post) that there is a maximum of 250 remember posts on G+. Rather, there are 250 maximum browseable posts. You can search all you want.

I’m not sure what to make of this. It certainly changes much of the perception of its value, at least to me. From what I understand, direct links work . But if you try to browse through someone’s posts, it stops after 23 pages or so.

This is rational to me from a programming standpoint. But from a user standpoint, this is pretty bad. Not a deal-breaker, but certainly means that I can’t give up on the blog just yet…

Share

Ditching the Magazines

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

Do you read LensWork? If you’re a photographer, you should. Shoot, if you like black and white photography at all, you should.

I’m not shilling for them, mind you. This is just my opionion: there’s no better publication for B&W art-style photography. Even if the photographs inside aren’t to my taste, I’ll happily say: at least the layout is dependable and you’re not constantly crushed by ads (all advertisements are in the beginning & end of each issue, but not between pages like a typical magazine).

I’m only mentioning this because I’m having a hard time focusing on content in magazines these days. In fact, I’m dumping my Professional Photographer and American Photo subscriptions altogether, and just skimming all others.

Here’s the problem: I’ll start reading an article, then I get interrupted. I have to skip a page where some loud advertisement is telling me that their shiny tool will make my life better. What was I reading? Oh yeah, skip a page. Read a bit more. Get distracted by sidebars, the smaller ads, ads on the opposite page, etc. Find a “article ends on page whatever” & skip to the end. Search through two or three endings to articles, find mine. What was I reading again?

The disconnects in the middle of reading are killing me.

I suppose this is how they’re doing things – and I suppose this is what they’re used to getting away with. But in the internet age, I don’t have to wade through that mess to get content, so I’m opting out.

Share

On the Road to Denali, one month later

Saturday, August 13th, 2011

I posted this nearly a month ago on Flickr:

On the road to Denali

On the road to Denali

I kinda liked it at the time – especially the wisp of cloud and the lower clouds on “normal” sized mountains (by some standards). I’m not so sure now, though. I can see how the HDR effect did pull in a great deal of detail in the foreground & effectively salvaged that, but the sky… It hurts to look at it now.

It’s strange in this case – I never noticed the gradation of the blues in the large size. Looked totally normal. If this were blown up to 16″x20″, it might be fine. But in smaller, web-presentation sizes… well, it’s painful.

So yes, the more I look at it, the less I like it. I think that most people have the same reaction – it’s easily the most viewed photograph of the last month by Flickr standards.

Share

The Film effect on Underwater Digital Photography

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

Perhaps this title is a bit misleading.  Think of this as more of personal observations of how shooting black and white film over the winter led to new perspectives and improved results when I went back to digital for our recent vacation.

There were three areas where I felt improvement was particularly noticeable:

  • Composition;
  • Contrast in Tonality;
  • Improved wide-angle perspective;

Click to continue »

Share

A new Perspective

Sunday, July 4th, 2010

I was watching a class on Kelby Training yesterday that featured Jay Maisel. Now, I’ve seen Jay before, and I’m familiar with many of his more common comments.  There are a few things he has said that has resonated deeply with me.  The one that is sticking with me today (paraphrased):

When I get ready to take a picture, and it’s something I’ve seen before, why bother? I’m interested in something new.

Mind you, he’s not dismissing photographs for observation or study purposes. Nor for practicing technical details of photography.  He’s only speaking to his own tastes. Click to continue »

Share

Flickr Favebrowsr, an observation

Sunday, May 9th, 2010
Favebrowsr, today

Favebrowsr, today

This is really more of an observation about Flickr than anything else, but I’ve noticed: if you lock down your files in Flickr (no download, no seeing other sizes), but upload a larger-sized photo (compared to the on-screen display of a Flickr image), the full size is actually available to anyone who tries to access via the Flickr API.

Take this pic, for example. I favorited it just a short while ago. On screen, it’s fairly small – maybe 400 pixels wide.

Click to continue »

Share

Got my hands on an iPad…

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

… For a few minutes, at least. I have to say – I’m both impressed and underwhelmed.

It’s a pretty nice thing. Compact, solid, and surprisingly heavy. The clarity of pictures are surprisingly good, although I could detect some pixellation. The interface is nice & smooth – even nicer than the iPhone. And reading: much, much easier.

I could see myself loving it.

That being said, I’m completely underwhelmed. This is what the whole hubbub was all about? A glorified iTouch, for $800?

Ouch. No thanks.

But feel free to buy me one. I promise I won’t whine about it…

Share

I think I have figured it out

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Reflecting over this over the last few weeks, I think I know why I’m not happy with my work this year. I’m bored with it, and it shows. Specifically, the vast majority of what I like in photography can be lumped under the “landscape” category of photography. By now, I’ve taken most of the shots I really, really like, so nothing feels new.

Compounding the problem: the LX3 can’t really pull off some of the shots that I’d like it to, and that’s my quick-carry camera.  This time of year we have spectacular sunrises over mountains and nighttime clouds – something that would be great to capture.  But you need zoom.  I’m not sure that a 200mm on a DX sensor would do it, even.  But carry around the 400mm lens? That would be the day I’d need the wide-angle.

Hrm…

Share

2009 was a Great Year

Saturday, May 1st, 2010

Perhaps not financially, or politically, but photographically. Looking back, I’m definitely happier with my work back then.

I’m not sure what has happened – I mean, my pace of learning has continued, but the spark just isn’t there.

Share