thoughts

...now browsing by tag

 
 

This will be a slow read

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Referring to “Within the Frame,” that is. Barely a chapter in & it’s making me think.  Take, for example, the most recent photo posted here. Decent, but I’m not sure it works.

I mean, the view was spectacular: clouds rolling in, overhead.  The sky blue, but going hazy – the sun was losing its strength.  But there, in the distance: yes, it’s light, hitting the mountain!  This is a great thing, if only I can show the contrast well.  And in that sense, I think it failed.

Early on, duChemin makes a point about color.  To paraphrase: if color doesn’t add anything to the meaning of the frame, don’t use it.  It will merely dilute the main idea.

Now, Mr. duChemin prefers monotones and duotones.  I’m not really sure what I prefer, although I do have a strong affinity for B&W – especially through NIK’s Silver efex plugin.  So I played around with a few versions, trying to get a feel for things.  What ended up being my favorite:

Hospital again, in B&W

Hospital again, in B&W

If you view it large, you’ll get the intended effect: the light on the mountains, darkness all around.

This was, perhaps, a tad overdone in processing.  But it makes two points: first, color wasn’t really an integral part of the experience.  Black and white rendering makes that distant brightness really stand out.  Second, the processing in B&W allowed me to focus on really driving in the differences in luminosity, which again drove in the point of there being light in the distance.

Besides, I also got to make it look coolish with the grain and what all…

  • Share/Bookmark

Stop

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Seriously, just stop.  You’re going somewhere – the the store, to a friend’s, to work. You see the light, and it’s beautiful – say, a cold sunny day, but clouds building on the mountains to the east. The clouds pool, like a living mist.  It’s beautiful, you should stop.  But you keep going – it’s cold, you say.  Don’t have the right lens, you say.  You move on.

Too late, you’ve missed your chance. Click to continue »

  • Share/Bookmark

Photography and Style

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

I suppose this is a symptom of having read too much, but over the years I’ve read thousands of posts, hundreds (well, over one hundred to be sure) of books, and attended dozens of lectures. Paid out of my own pocket for a few one-day lessons/seminars, even.

A subject that keeps coming up is “know your style”. This is similar, in my mind, to the phrase “find your voice” that I heard so often in writing classes.

And just like in writing classes, I think it’s utter hogwash.

Yeah, you’re probably not convinced – there isn’t a wide range of photographic styles really shown on this site. Mostly environmental landscapes with a few abstracts.  Well, that’s what I show here. I’m not interested (right now, at least) in showing my portaits, or my experiments, or my higher-end photos.  This blog is mostly about my experiments.

Look , my “style” depends completely on my mood.  Wintertime?  I’m in a dark mood.  Lots of dark photos, heavy on the shadows.  On vacation in a warm place in the cold, Alaskan winter?  You’ll see bright, almost overly-saturated photos.  I’m loving the respite from daily grayscale (and that’s really what Anchorage is like in the winter!), and I focus on that.  In-between?  Anything goes.  Alaskan summers I can get into strange grains, or lose myself in odd effects.  Having a bad day?  You’ll see textures creeping in to my images.  Strong emotions of any sort?  I start getting into abstracts.  Around family?  Suddenly I go all photojournalist on you.

“Know your style” indeed.  Photographic style is deeply personal, and depends deeply on the person.

  • Share/Bookmark